in

Oklahoma loss of life row inmate will get one final likelihood to plead his case: “We’re preventing for a person’s life”


An Oklahoma man on loss of life row for a homicide he says he didn’t commit can have one final likelihood to plead his case at a clemency listening to at the moment.

In 1999, on the age of 19, Julius Jones was convicted of killing Paul Howell. Jones has at all times maintained his innocence, and his household says he was residence on the time of the homicide.

In September, the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board really useful Gov. Kevin Stitt commute Jones’ sentence to life in jail. The board’s chairman mentioned, “I consider in loss of life penalty instances there must be little question, and put merely, I’ve doubts on this case.”

Each households need the identical factor – justice – however they see the case very in another way.

Paul Howell’s daughter is adamant that Jones killed her father and that the proof helps that.

julius-jones-paul-howell.jpg
Julius Jones, who’s scheduled to be executed for the 1999 homicide of Paul Howell, has one closing likelihood at clemency, after claiming that he was wrongly convicted.   

CBS Information


The Jones household says Julius is harmless, that race performed a task in his conviction, and the system failed him when he was 19 years previous. They are saying, now it is time his aspect is heard.

Julius’ sister, Antoinette Jones, is main the power that is pushing to maintain her older brother alive.

“We’re preventing for a person’s life,” Antoinette instructed correspondent Mireya Villarreal. “What you might be seeing us do is what ought to have been carried out 20 years in the past.”

Villarreal requested, “What’s the fact about him?”

“The reality about my brother is, he’s an harmless man on loss of life row.”

On July 28, 1999, Paul Howell was murdered exterior his mother and father’ residence in entrance of his household. His SUV was stolen, and witnesses reported seeing a Black man with a purple bandana and 1-2 inches of hair shoot the daddy of two.

Three days later, 19-year-old Julius Jones was arrested at his residence. His household says eyewitness descriptions do not match Julius, who on the time had a shaved head.

Villarreal requested Antoinette, “What makes you so positive they’ve the mistaken particular person?”

“As a result of I do know the place my brother was that night time of the homicide of Mr. Paul Scott,” she replied. “He was at residence together with his household. We had been consuming spaghetti and cornbread. Earlier than we ate spaghetti and cornbread, we had been enjoying Monopoly.”

For years the household has asserted neither Jones nor his household had been allowed to testify about essential particulars as a result of his protection crew was insufficient. They are saying his public defender was inexperienced and did not cross-examine witnesses.

Additionally they say race performed a task, pointing to a White juror and the officer who arrested him allegedly calling Jones the N-word.

A 2018 documentary about Jones, “The Final Protection,” targeted on proof attorneys didn’t current at courtroom about Christopher Jordan. 

Jordan was convicted of homicide for driving the getaway automotive in Howell’s loss of life, however he has allegedly admitted to no less than three others that he shot Howell and framed Jones.

Jones spoke to the movie crew from jail saying he regretted not saying it was Jordan who dedicated the crime.

“I imply, that is in all probability my biggest downfall, that I by no means mentioned something to the police,” Jones mentioned. “However the place I grew up, you are not imagined to be telling different individuals’s enterprise as a result of dangerous issues can occur to you. These individuals set me as much as take the autumn. As a result of they knew somebody was going to fry for this.”

For the reason that documentary aired, Jones’ case has obtained consideration from celebrities like Kim Kardashian and Stephen Curry.

Rachel Howell was 9 years previous when her father was killed, and was with him that day. “There’s quite a lot of misinformation round this case,” she mentioned, “and the general public has been given a false narrative about this case.

“Julius Jones and his household and their supporters declare that he didn’t get the chance to testify in courtroom,” mentioned Howell. “That’s fully false. Yow will discover it within the transcripts, when you do the analysis. They requested him a number of occasions if he’s waiving his proper to testify, and he is agreed, he didn’t need to testify.”

Jones’ clemency listening to is the primary time she’ll truly get to confront the person convicted of killing her father. Howell instructed Villarreal, “He was an harmless man, taking his children to get ice cream with my aunt. He was murdered in entrance of me and my sister and my aunt. Perceive that we’re the victims right here. We now have carried out nothing mistaken, and it virtually looks like we’re doing one thing mistaken by talking out.”

Their hope for fact is a sentiment shared by the Jones household.

“They need justice,” Villarreal mentioned.

“They need justice; we wish justice,” mentioned Antoinette Jones. “That is why each time I say, ‘Justice for Julius,’ and each time I am preventing for my brother, I am preventing for Mr. Paul Howell.”

A number of appeals courts have upheld the ruling, saying that the case was carried out pretty.  

If at at the moment’s listening to clemency is really useful, the ultimate phrase goes to Oklahoma’s governor. He decides whether or not or not Julius Jones lives or dies. If he does grant clemency, that does not imply Jones will instantly stroll out of jail. 

If he isn’t granted clemency, Julius Jones will face execution on November 18.



Source link

Supply & Picture rights : https://www.cbsnews.com/information/julius-jones-oklahoma-death-row-clemency-hearing/

DISCLAIMER:
Beneath Part 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “truthful use” for functions equivalent to criticism, remark, information reporting, educating, scholarship, and analysis. Truthful use is a use permitted by copyright statute that may in any other case be infringing.”

What do you think?

64 Points
Upvote Downvote

Written by Newsplaneta

Newsplaneta.com - Latest Worldwide Online News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

6 NYC firefighters suspended after driving fireplace truck to lawmaker’s workplace and allegedly making threats over COVID vaccine mandate

Fourth stimulus examine newest: What’s behind the push for recurring funds?