Accusing the petitioner of “unclean palms” and “selective outrage”, the BJP authorities in Tripura has filed a strongly-worded objection to a plea within the Supreme Court docket which sought an impartial probe into incidents of communal violence that happened within the state final October.
Questioning the petitioner’s “silence” on the violence in Bengal earlier than and after final yr’s elections, the Tripura authorities labelled the Public Curiosity Litigation “selective public curiosity” and referred to as for a for an “exemplary value” to be imposed upon the petitioner.
The state authorities has requested the Supreme Court docket to dismiss the petition and has identified that the highest courtroom had refused to intervene when a plea which had sought a probe into the Bengal post-poll violence was introduced earlier than it. The Supreme Court docket had requested the petitioners to method Excessive Court docket as a substitute.
“The so-called ‘public spirit’ of the petitioners didn’t transfer few months again in a bigger scale of communal violence and immediately their ‘public spirit’ aroused as a result of some cases in a small state like Tripura,” the state authorities’s submitting learn.
Calling the petitioner’s allegations “unilateral, exaggerated and distorted model of incidents”, the Tripura authorities stated instances have already been registered and arrests made in opposition to these liable for the violence. Their hyperlinks with Pakistan’s spy company ISI have been additionally being probed, it stated.
The highest courtroom had earlier issued discover to the Tripura authorities, which went so far as arresting journalists reporting on the incidents of violence final yr, looking for its response on the plea filed by lawyer Ehtesham Hashmi.
Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, showing for Mr Hashmi, had stated final yr that they need an impartial probe into the “latest communal riots and investigation into the alleged complicity of police in it”.
“There are a number of instances associated to Tripura earlier than the courtroom. Few attorneys, who went on fact-finding missions, have been served with notices. UAPA costs have been slapped on journalists. Police didn’t register a single FIR within the instances of violence. We wish all this to be investigated by an impartial panel monitored by the courtroom,” Mr Bhushan stated.
The north-eastern state had witnessed incidents of arson, looting and violence after studies emerged from Bangladesh that Hindu minorities there had been attacked throughout ‘Durga Puja’ on allegations of blasphemy.
Supply & Picture rights : https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/tripura-violence-pil-tripuras-rebuttal-to-communal-violence-plea-what-about-bengal-2724300
Below Part 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “honest use” for functions resembling criticism, remark, information reporting, educating, scholarship, and analysis. Honest use is a use permitted by copyright statute that may in any other case be infringing.”